Abstract
This paper examines the role of laws and government policies in facilitating or hindering the success of e-governance in developing countries, with a focus on Sri Lanka and India. Both countries started digital governance programs in the early 2000s, Sri Lanka with the e- Sri Lanka project and India with the Digital India mission. However, India has seen more success due to its better legal systems, more decisive leadership, and increased use of the services. India’s progress is attributed to its clear laws, such as the Information Technology Act (2000), a robust national identity system (Aadhaar), and useful services like DigiLocker and UMANG. These tools help people access government services online safely and efficiently. In contrast, Sri Lanka continues to face challenges. There is no law to protect personal data, and people in rural areas often lack sufficient knowledge and access to digital tools. Many government offices are not connected, resulting in slow and confusing services. This paper employs a comparative method, examining laws and policies, surveys, and interviews in both countries. It identifies several areas of weakness in Sri Lanka, including the absence of clear digital laws, overlapping responsibilities among various government agencies, inadequate legal training for workers, and limited digital education for the public. The paper states that Sri Lanka needs a robust plan. It should create a digital law to support online services, form a special national team for e-governance, allow users to give service feedback, and work with India to learn about legal technology. Training programs for civil servants and digital awareness campaigns should also be introduced. The main idea is that digital progress is not just about having technology. It also needs good laws, precise planning, and public trust. Without this, digital tools might exacerbate inequality. Based on what has worked in India, the paper gives a policy roadmap to help Sri Lanka improve. If Sri Lanka strengthens its legal system and works closely with its citizens, it can build a better digital future for everyone.
Manuscript
Received
July 1, 2025
Accepted
For Publication
September 10, 2025
Archived
Online
December 1, 2025